The more Robbie Keane’s name appears with the Celtic job, the more this feels like it could be one of the most controversial managerial appointments in our history.

Not because he’s a terrible coach.

But because of the timing.

And because of who’s making the decision to appoint Mr Keane.

Michael Nicholson and the current board are hardly operating from a position of strength.

Supporters are already questioning the football structure.

They’re questioning recruitment.

The lack of a director of football.

And whether anybody at boardroom level actually has a long-term plan.

KEANE- Not A Serious Managerial Search

So seeing Keane’s name appearing feels less like a serious managerial search and more like somebody on the Celtic board trying to test the water.

The response hasn’t exactly been overwhelming enthusiasm.

Outside the usual board cheerleaders and green-tinted ultras who would probably applaud a Balikwisha contract extension, the reaction has largely been concern.

That’s because of Keane’s managerial history, which you can find lots about online.

More of my concerns are that this appointment reeks of “jobs for the bhoys”

Which is concerning because this summer could define the next five years of the club.

We’re potentially overseeing a turnover of £100 million.

Key players leaving…

Champions League qualification on the horizon.

This isn’t the moment to appoint somebody because they had a six-month spell here and can recite a few songs.

This is the moment to appoint somebody capable of winning the next five league titles.

Somebody capable of building a football department.

And dragging us back towards being a serious European club again.

Instead, it feels like we’re once again drifting towards another familiar Irish football figure with a connection to the club and a story supporters are expected to buy into.

Maybe Keane becomes a top manager.

Maybe he proves every doubter wrong.

But if the board genuinely believes the answer to one of the biggest managerial decisions in years is simply finding another former player, then they’re asking the wrong question entirely.

Celtic DNA Obsession

One thing our club has always loved is “Celtic DNA”.

Martin O’Neill.

Neil Lennon.

Brendan Rodgers.

And now Keane.

People who understand the club, understand the support, and fit the identity.

I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, but having a connection to the club doesn’t automatically make somebody the best candidate.

At times I feel as a club we use a lot of buzzwords to describe what we want in a manager or what we expect a Celtic manager to be. It feels less like a football strategy and more like a marketing campaign.

Very rarely will I hear someone say, ‘I’m looking for a manager who plays expansive 4-3-3 attacking football.’

It’s more – I want a manager who speaks like Ange, understand the club like O’Neill and he needs to be from Ireland or have a Scottish granny

Why, though?

Why do I feel like the appointment of Robbie Keane is something designed to sell a story rather than answer difficult football questions?

The club’s idea of “DNA” often seems to stop at nationality and nostalgia.

Irish.

Scottish.

Former player.

Job done.

The Predictable And Lazy Approach

Get the bloke to pose for a few photos of an Adidas launch every second week for a new training kit with a clover on it.

We are so much more but seem to market ourselves as so much less.

This job is one of the biggest in the world, and the best we can do is Robbie Keane?

I’m not sure about that…

Celtic DNA was never supposed to be heritage.

Where somebody was born.

Who they supported as a child.

Or whether they can recite the club’s history.

That’s why reducing “Celtic DNA” to another former player with Irish roots feels increasingly shallow.

The phrase should mean more than that.

Much more.

BREAKING: Celtic principal shareholder Dermot Desmond is due to meet with Martin O’Neill and Robbie Keane this week over the managerial vacancy. ? pic.twitter.com/wg7oaYImLr

— Sky Sports News (@SkySportsNews) June 1, 2026

If the board genuinely believes “DNA” simply means finding somebody who wore a top a few times fifteen years ago, then they’ve misunderstood the very thing they’re trying to sell.

What Does Celtic DNA Really Mean

The uncomfortable part is “Celtic DNA” doesn’t just stop at branding.

I feel it becomes something the board hides behind.

A safety net.

A justification when things go wrong to give people more time.

Neil Lennon was given huge patience during the COVID period because of his connection to the club and what he represented to us as a support.

And I’m not saying Wilfried Nancy would have succeeded here — far from it.

But you do have to ask the question honestly.

Would Nancy have been afforded the same patience if he came with a Scottish or Irish background and a stronger emotional link to the support?

That’s the problem with leaning too heavily on identity.

It can blur the line between football decisions and emotional protection.

And it creates a situation where “DNA” becomes less about standards and more about shielding decisions from scrutiny.

Which is why it matters so much in the next appointment.

What if Keane goes on a run of games like Nancy did? Could our board sack him? I don’t think they would.

And that’s when it stops helping the club… and starts limiting it.

13 November 2014; Republic of Ireland manager Martin O’Neill, left and Robbie Keane speaking to the press ahead of their UEFA EURO 2016 Championship Qualifer Group D game against Scotland on Friday. Republic of Ireland Press Conference, Celtic Park, Glasgow, Scotland. Picture credit: David Maher / SPORTSFILE (Photo by Sportsfile/Corbis/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

The Manager or the Shield?

Playing devil’s advocate, if you look at Keane’s managerial record properly; without the noise, you can actually see why his name is in the conversation.

It’s not completely without logic.

videocelts.com

Message History

Delivery option(s)